Hi Sol, Leigh, and friends,
I want to bring you the good news that the tingling in my right arm has disappeared. I had been concerned since May 4, the day after the Worldwide Potentiation Ceremony, since it so suddenly appeared, was intensely felt, and persisted day after day (albeit, over weeks, with less frequency and less intensity). The good thing about that side effect is that it informed me that the Potentiation had actually occurred, since the beneficial effects, while definitely felt, were slower to come and subtle to feel by comparison. So I am happy for this relief, especially recalling your foresight, Sol, that you had a very good hunch that the tingling would eventually subside. I have to give credit also to Eileen McKusick's sound therapy activations, which I have been participating in once a week during an online course she is giving. You had advised me in advance that experiencing other modalities would not interfere with our May 3 Potentiation. Perhaps Eileen's treatments expedited the dissipation of the tingling...?
Moving on, I have a couple of questions, related to the Solfeggio scale (which you discuss in Conscious Healing), about EM frequencies. (Eileen discusses the Solfeggio scale too in her book, Tuning the Human Biofield.) I need to ask for my own research (am writing a paper). I read yesterday in an article by Michael Garko a quotation from one of his sources, S. Stockton, who wrote, The Terrain Is Everything: Contextual Factors that Influence Our Health. Garko cites Stockton's list of "factors holding the potential to undermine the homeostasis of the [body's] terrain...that make people susceptible to disease." One of these eight factors is "electromagnetic pollution (the effects of 60 cycle current, microwaves, etc.)" There's the stumper. An electric current of 60 cycles (60 Hz) seems pretty harmless when compared to the frequencies of the Solfeggio scale, you know, Ut rings at 396 Hz; Re sounds off at 417 Hz; Mi at 528; Fa at 639, Sol, 741; and La chimes at 852 Hz). I definitely see how microwaves are harmful at 300 MHz -- 300 GHz, by comparison with Solfeggio frequencies, and also infrared at 300 GHz -- 400 THz. But why would Stockton list the 60 cycle current as harmful? He must know something I don't, or am I misreading the technical lingo here? I can't find the answer, not yet...
Many many thanks,
Gordon
July 1, 2020
Replies
All I meant was that, for example, X cycles might be helpful, while Y cycles could be harmful--and it doesn't matter that Y > X. What matters is the exact number of cycles, not how many cycles there are. It's not a contest, it's a precise number thing.
As for your question, there is a toroidal-shaped EM energy field (not sure how many bands we're talking) around the body that some people call the biohologram. This isn't the same as the bioenergy blueprint, which is a set torsion (not EM) fields that give rise to the EM fields and the body. The lightbody is actually the body when it changes into a different type of "rainbow body."
I'd imagine that in Eileen's work, the biofield is the EM energy field. (It's been a long time since I read her first book.) Those trained in Eileen's work might want to chime in and corroborate or correct me here.
Thanks for getting back to me so soon, Sol.
Your answer is helpful, but I never heard of the frequency level. Can you go a little further with that? It seems that the frequency level does play a role. If 60 cycles (but that is a number!?) measures the frequency level of electricity (not radio or microwaves or infrared) is it harmful to the health of living beings? Just need more specifics to make it clear
I did have another question, actually. I tagged it on later (having slipped my mind), after sending the first email, as a PS, and clicked +Add, but it doesn't seem it got through. Anyway, is the lightbody and the biomagnetic field (the biofield) that envelopes the human body in a toroidal shape (that carries or is structured with 12 bands of energy that themselves are each comprised of 12 bands) one and the same? Are these terms synonymous? If each is an entity in and of itself, then how are they different? Eileen McKusick speaks of both but in different places without making a clear connection.
Gordon
Great news about the tingling, Gordon!
I think the short answer to your cycles question (the only one I saw) is that the frequency level doesn't matter so much as the specific frequency number ... It's not that a higher number of cycles is necessarily good or bad ...